There is something about the name “David” which brings to
mind age-old standards of perfection. “David”
is of Hebrew origin and means “darling” and “beloved,” and it’s easy to
automatically think back to the ancient story of David and Goliath, where young
battle novice David takes on Goliath, champion of the Philistines, in the
Valley of Elah. Everybody knows how that
story ends – the little guy wins and becomes the “darling” and “beloved” of
many for years to come, setting the stage for hundreds of battles between
supermen and underdogs.
If we think of the form of David, then instead of heading
right for the Bible, we think of Michelangelo, who sculpted the famous statue
between 1501 and 1504. It’s one of the
most recognizable pieces of art in the world today. And there’s a lot to think about with this David, how he compares to the other Davids
of today. There’s a mythology of the
statue that I learned about after I visited Italy, the kind of stuff which
becomes fascinating over time. Kind of
makes you wonder if people choose the name because of the story; because their
David is going to be their “darling;” or if they’re hoping he’ll become the
picture of perfection like the statue?
Michelangelo’s David
is relaxed; unlike many other renditions, which depict him with the head of
Goliath between his feet. David appears to be in deep thought –
Michelangelo was probably trying to show him before the battle instead of after
it. Another interesting facet of the
statue is the stance. Because of the way
Michelangelo has posed him, with one leg bearing all of the weight, it gives
the statue a curve not usually seen with male figures. It allows the shoulders and the hips to rest
at contrasting angles and gives the observer a better perspective of a true
human, male form. Since the statue was
actually started by Agostino di Duccio and Antonio Rossellino, the idea behind
the work changed in between inception and when Michelangelo was given the block
of marble to work on.
The original positioning of the sculpture was for the roof
of the Florence Cathedral, which is the main reason the head and the hands of
the statue seem out of scale with the rest of the figure (the important parts
of the sculpture were accentuated since they would be viewed from below and were
supposed to be recognizable). There is
also the contrast of the figure’s size in comparison to its height. Art historians have noted that David is extremely slender; while it can
be argued the true height of the statue (17 feet) doesn’t render the rest of
the body to scale, the proportions are still notable (and some argue, are what
Michelangelo could salvage out of the work of his predecessors).
And, perhaps most interesting is, in fact, David’s junk. Since the original David was a Jew, it would
have been proper for the statue to display him as circumcised. This wasn’t done, the purists argue, because
Renaissance art didn’t note such inconsistency.
Whatever the case may be, Michelangelo’s David has set the bar high for other
Davids to follow. I’ve dated Davids, and
lived with them; I’ve gone out to eat with them; and I’ve studied lots of
photographs of famous Davids in their skivvies.
There are a lot of good-looking, chiseled Davids out there, but which
one is closest to Michelangelo’s masterpiece?
While many replicas of Michelangelo’s masterpiece have popped up over
the world, that one perfect David is out there for all of us, waiting to be
seen and admired!
Below is the real David in addition to some other famous Davids I don’t
mind staring at. How well do you know
your famous Davids? (You’ve got Beckham,
Bentley, Boudia, Chokachi, Durante, Fumero, and Ginola here. Know which ones are which?)
P.S.: Just for fun, I
downloaded a “version list” of “David”s so the international traveler can
appreciate the numerous variations of the name.
You might want to squirrel this away for safekeeping, as it’s one of
those things that just might come in handy some day. If the language isn’t listed, then the likely
spelling or transliteration is “David,” just as it would be in English, without
diacritics. Languages not using the
Latin alphabet aren’t included.
Afrikaans, Polish, Syriac: Dawid
|
Icelandic: Davið
|
Albanian: Davidi
|
Indonesian: Daud
|
Amharic, Ge’ez: Dawit
|
Irish: Dáidhídh
|
Arabic: Dawood
|
Latin: Davidis
|
Armenian: Davit
|
Latvian: Dāvids
|
Bosnian, Persian, Turkish: Davud
|
Lithuanian: Davidas
|
Cornish: Daveth
|
Manx: Davy
|
Estonian: Taavet
|
Māori: Rāwiri
|
Finnish: Daavid
|
Mi’kmaq: Dabit
|
Galician, Italian: Davide
|
Swahili: Daudi
|
Hawaiian: Kawika
|
Welsh: Dafydd
|
Hungarian, Slovak: Dávid
|
Yiddish: Dovid
|
No comments:
Post a Comment